Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
69
Highlights
41
Differences
6
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 544
vs
Anker 543:
69 Highlights & 41 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Find out which Anker charger is better for travel and daily carry. The choice depends on your device needs and charging style.
Which one’s your upgrade — Anker 544 or Anker 543? We compared specs like usb-c ports, weight, travel size classification & child safety shutter and more to help you choose smarter.
Anker 544 vs Anker 543 Charger: Which Power Hub Powers Up Your Devices Better?
The world of charging gadgets is bustling with options, and Anker's 544 and 543 chargers stand out as solid contenders. Both chargers cater to indoor users and pack multi-device charging capabilities; each can handle up to four devices simultaneously. They share a premium build quality, incorporate heat-resistant materials, and deliver reliable, consistent charging with high energy efficiency.
However, the two diverge significantly in power output, port configuration, and special features such as wireless charging and portability. Notably, the Anker 544 comes equipped with Qi2 wireless charging at 7.5W, while the 543 boasts a higher maximum output power of 65W and a dynamic power distribution system to support more power-hungry devices like laptops. Whether you prioritize lightweight wireless convenience or powerful versatility defines which model fits your needs best.
Soaring Lightness with Wireless Convenience: The Anker 544
The Anker 544 charger positions itself as the perfect companion for users who crave a sleek, lightweight charging setup. Weighing just 0.1 lbs and standing a mere 1.5 inches tall, it is extremely easy to integrate into your desktop or bedside station. Its standout feature is the integrated 7.5W Qi2 wireless charging pad, which allows users to power compatible phones or accessories without fumbling for cables. That wireless prowess, combined with a single USB-C port, targets beginners or light users who value convenience over the number of ports.
The charger's lack of USB-A ports keeps the design minimal, but may not fit heavy multi-port needs. Its LED indicators offer a clear charger status at a glance, enhancing user experience during daily use. Although it lacks the travel-friendly label, this device excels indoors with excellent heat management and a reassuring multi-layer safety redundancy. Priced around $39.25 at reebelo.com, it offers a highly functional and lean charging experience for casual tech users.
Powerhouse with Ports and Travel Savvy: The Anker 543
Conversely, the Anker 543 charger tips the scales to support intermediate users requiring a bit more juice and versatility. Coming in at a heftier 0.3 lbs and dimensions of roughly 3.5 inches by 3.54 inches, it surprisingly carries the compact travel-friendly badge, making it the better choice for on-the-go users who value more charging options. It boasts an impressive 65W max output and supports a higher 20V output voltage, ready to power laptops alongside tablets and phones.
With two USB-C ports and two USB-A ports, it handles multiple wired devices fuss-free, catering especially well to users who employ a mix of charging cables. Although it lacks wireless charging, its dynamic power distribution optimizes charging efficiency when devices share the load. The charger's instant protection response and superior scratch resistance add to its durability. Paired with a slightly longer 1.5-year warranty, the 543 charger is a robust, efficient option for users needing a diverse and powerful charging station. It is available for about $39.99 at Amazon.
Quick Take
The Anker 544 shines with its featherweight form and integrated Qi2 wireless charging, making it ideal for those who want hassle-free, wire-free charging with intuitive LED status cues. Meanwhile, the Anker 543 brings higher wattage, a versatile mix of ports, and travel-ready compactness suitable for powering laptops and multiple devices efficiently on the move. Both deliver strong build quality and safety features, but cater to distinctly different charging priorities.
Bottom Line
If your priority is effortless wireless charging and portability within a stationary setup, the Anker 544 is a compelling choice. However, if you demand maximum power output, extensive wired connectivity, and a design built for travel with advanced safety and durability, the Anker 543 emerges as the superior all-rounder. The 543's ability to charge laptops and dynamic power division, combined with a longer warranty, make it the go-to for power users.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 543 - Offers more power, versatile port options, travel-friendly design, and enhanced safety features, making it a robust charger for a wide range of devices, including laptops.
Runner-up: Anker 544 - Best suited for users who prefer lightweight chargers with wireless Qi2 support and clear LED indicators, focusing on indoor convenience and simplicity.
The Product Name for Anker 544 is 'Anker 544' while Anker 543 is branded as 'Anker 543 Charger (65W II)'. Both names clearly identify each model for consumers, with Anker 543's name hinting at its 65W power capability, useful for quick recognition.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
60
Anker 544
0Votes
Fast Charging, Wireless Charging, Qi2
85
Anker 543
0Votes
GaN
vs
Charging Technology
Anker 544 supports Fast Charging, Wireless Charging, and Qi2 standards, while Anker 543 uses GaN technology. Anker 544 offers more charging tech variety including wireless options, making it versatile for wireless-enabled devices compared to Anker 543.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
75
Anker 544
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
75
Anker 543
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker 543
Designed for versatile use in home, office, and travel environments, making it adaptable for multiple charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
85
Anker 544
0Votes
AC Outlet
85
Anker 543
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 543
Power is sourced from an AC outlet, the standard household electrical supply.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
45
Anker 544
0Votes
Plug-In
45
Anker 543
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 544
The installation type is plug-in, allowing the charger to be easily connected to a power outlet without requiring any wiring installation.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What year was this charger released?
73
Anker 544
0Votes
2022
65
Anker 543
0Votes
2021
vs
Release Year
Anker 544 was released in 2022, one year after Anker 543 which was released in 2021. The newer release of Anker 544 may include more recent innovations, giving it a slight edge in updated technology.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
User Level
What user level is this charger designed for?
15
Anker 544
0Votes
Beginner
55
Anker 543
0Votes
Intermediate
vs
User Level
Anker 544 is designed for Beginners whereas Anker 543 targets Intermediate users. This difference suggests Anker 544 may be simpler to use while Anker 543 offers more advanced features, making each suitable for different expertise levels.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
65
Anker 544
0Votes
UL
70
Anker 543
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS, Qi
Anker 544
The charger bears UL certification, a widely recognized safety certification ensuring the product complies with strict safety standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
70
Anker 544
0Votes
Wireless Charger
35
Anker 543
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
55
Anker 544
0Votes
Desktop
65
Anker 543
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Environment
Where can this charger be used?
35
Anker 544
0Votes
Indoor
35
Anker 543
0Votes
Indoor
vs
Usage Environment
Both Anker 544 and Anker 543 are intended for Indoor use, making them ideal for home or office environments. There is no difference here, so both chargers are similarly suitable for indoor charging needs.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
45
Anker 544
0Votes
US
75
Anker 543
0Votes
Global
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
55
Anker 544
0Votes
Compact
55
Anker 543
0Votes
Compact
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage differs significantly: Anker 544 operates at 5V, whereas Anker 543 outputs 20V. The higher voltage of Anker 543 supports fast charging of laptops and high-power devices, making it better for those purposes.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
15.0 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 544
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.8
A
0Votes
vs
Input Current
Input Current is unavailable for Anker 544, while Anker 543 operates at 1.8A. Knowing Anker 543's input current is helpful for power management, making it more transparent for technical users.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers include Short Circuit Protection, adding vital safety by preventing electrical faults. This ensures user safety on either model without compromise.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling is considerably higher in Anker 544 at 120W, compared to 65W for Anker 543. This suggests Anker 544 can manage short bursts of high power better, suitable for demanding device loads.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
55.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 544
The input voltage of the device is 100 Volt, supporting standard power supplies in many regions.
Anker 543
The input voltage is 100 Volt, a common voltage compatible with standard North American electrical outlets.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 544
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
5
Watt
0Votes
Anker 543
The minimum output power is 5 Watt, which ensures compatibility with low-power devices.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3
A
0Votes
3.25
A
0Votes
Anker 543
Output current is 3.25 A, providing sufficient amperage for rapid charging.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 544
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Anker 543
The standby power consumption is 0.1 Watt, which is very low, helping reduce unwanted power drain when the charger is idle.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Low
Anker 544
Ripple and noise are minimal, which contributes to clean power delivery and protects sensitive electronics from interference.
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 543
Overvoltage protection is included, safeguarding connected devices from voltage spikes.
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
60
Watt
0Votes
65
Watt
1Votes
vs
Maximum Output Power
Anker 544 delivers a Maximum Output Power of 60W, while Anker 543 offers slightly higher at 65W. The 5W difference makes Anker 543 more powerful for fast charging larger devices such as laptops.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
5.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 544 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 543 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 544
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Anker 543
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Power Distribution Method
Power Distribution Method is not available for Anker 544 but is Dynamic for Anker 543. Dynamic distribution in Anker 543 provides smarter power allocation among devices, potentially enhancing charging efficiency.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency is High on both Anker 544 and Anker 543, indicating good thermal design to keep devices cool and safe during charging.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
85
Anker 544
0Votes
Standby
45
Anker 543
1Votes
Power-Off
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
For Idle Charging Behavior, Anker 544 uses Standby mode, and Anker 543 powers off completely. Power-Off in Anker 543 may save more energy when idle, making it more energy-efficient during non-use.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
40 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 544 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 543 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Idle charging mode on the 544 is standby which helps with quick charging but the 543 powering off might save a bit more energy.
See more
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
75
Anker 544
0Votes
4
74
Anker 543
0Votes
4
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Both Anker 544 and Anker 543 support charging up to 4 devices simultaneously. This equal capacity suits users needing multi-device charging without performance compromise.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
45
Anker 544
0Votes
Stable
45
Anker 543
0Votes
Stable
Anker 543
Charging stability is rated as stable, ensuring a consistent and reliable power output for connected devices.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
55
Anker 544
0Votes
Fast
55
Anker 543
0Votes
Fast
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
60
Watt
0Votes
45
Watt
0Votes
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
15.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
Gradual
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Gradual
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 544
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 543
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency
Is charging speed consistent?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
Consistent
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Consistent
vs
Charging Consistency
Charging Consistency is rated as Consistent for both chargers, ensuring reliable power delivery. Users can expect steady charging performance with either Anker 544 or Anker 543.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
High
95
Anker 543
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
70
Anker 544
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C, Magnetic
85
Anker 543
0Votes
USB-C
Anker 544
The charger supports multiple connector types including USB-A, USB-C, and Magnetic, offering versatile compatibility with various devices. Magnetic connectors facilitate easy attachment and detachment, enhancing user convenience.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 544
It features a detachable cable, providing flexibility for storage and compatibility with various cable types.
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
How long is the charging cable?
5
ft
0Votes
5
ft
0Votes
vs
Cable Length
Both chargers come with a 5 ft cable length, offering equal convenience in placement flexibility without needing extra extension.
Length of the included charging cable.
In the battle of Cable Length,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
High
95
Anker 543
0Votes
High
Anker 544
Ports are rated for high durability, meaning they can withstand frequent plugging and unplugging without degradation.
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
High
95
Anker 543
0Votes
High
Anker 544
Connector durability is high, supporting frequent connections without deterioration in performance or fit.
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 544
Magnetic alignment ensures easy and precise connection of magnetic cables to the charger, improving convenience and reducing wear.
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
35
Anker 544
0Votes
4
35
Anker 543
0Votes
4
Anker 543
Provides a total of 4 ports for charging multiple devices simultaneously.
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Power
What is the wireless charging power?
7.5
Watt
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 543
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Wireless Charging Power
Anker 544 supports Wireless Charging Power of 7.5W, while Anker 543 lacks wireless charging capability. This makes Anker 544 better suited for wireless charging users.
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Plugs
Does it support interchangeable plugs?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
vs
Interchangeable Plugs
Neither Anker 544 nor Anker 543 offer Interchangeable Plugs. Users needing this feature should consider other options.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
56
Anker 544
0Votes
Front
55
Anker 543
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
No
0Votes
Anker 543
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
Auto
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal fail-safe mode is included to automatically reduce power or shut down the charger in case of excessive temperature, protecting both device and user.
Anker 543
Thermal fail-safe mode is supported, which helps prevent overheating by shutting down or throttling the charger under thermal stress.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
The charger supports the Qi2 wireless charging standard, which provides improved efficiency and compatibility with the latest wireless charging devices.
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
In the battle of Wireless Charging Standard,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging is supported by both chargers. Either Anker 544 or Anker 543 can efficiently power tablets, catering to common device needs.
Indicates compatibility with tablets and similar devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 543
USB Power Delivery is supported, enabling faster and safer charging for compatible devices.
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 543
PPS (Programmable Power Supply) is supported, allowing the charger to dynamically adjust voltage and current for optimized fast charging of compatible devices.
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 543
Supports charging for Android devices, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of smartphones and tablets.
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
No
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
vs
Laptop Charging
Laptop Charging is supported only by Anker 543, not by Anker 544. For laptop users, Anker 543 is the clear better option.
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Anker 543
Backward compatibility is supported, allowing the charger to work with older or less advanced devices.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility
How broad is cross-brand compatibility?
25
Anker 544
0Votes
Limited
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Universal
vs
Cross-Brand Compatibility
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Limited in Anker 544 but Universal in Anker 543. Anker 543 supports a wider range of brands, better for users with diverse devices.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 543
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
55
Anker 544
0Votes
Passive
55
Anker 543
0Votes
Passive
Anker 544
The charger employs a passive thermal dissipation method, which means it relies on natural air flow to manage heat without using fans, resulting in quieter operation.
Anker 543
The thermal dissipation method used is Passive, meaning the device relies on heat sinks or natural convection without fans for cooling. Passive cooling tends to be quieter and requires less maintenance compared to active cooling.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
0
Anker 544
0Votes
Medium
0
Anker 543
0Votes
Medium
Anker 543
The ambient temperature tolerance is medium, meaning it can operate reliably in typical indoor environments but may have limitations in extreme heat or cold.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
20
Anker 544
0Votes
Moderate
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Low
Anker 544
Energy loss as heat is moderate within the charger, balancing performance and thermal management.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
Anker 544 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
75 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
46
Anker 544
0Votes
32–95°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 543
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
76
Anker 544
0Votes
-4–140°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 543
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
65
Anker 544
0Votes
Heat Sink
65
Anker 543
0Votes
Heat Sink
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 544
Yes
0Votes
Anker 543
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 544 ◉ is
better than
Anker 543 ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 544
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 543
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability
How stable is temperature under sustained load?
95
Anker 544
0Votes
Stable
95
Anker 543
0Votes
Stable
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 544 ◉ is
same as
Anker 543 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 544 ◉
vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
